Academic honesty starts with transparency. Generative AI systems are tools, not crutches and as they become common place in all aspects of life, scholars need to consistently communicate how and what they are using generative AI for in their work.
Most of the main style guides now have information on how to properly cite generative AI systems, however, if a style does not have explicit information on how to cite the system, attribution will be your best option.
“Prompt text.” Name of AI Tool, version (if known), Company, Date of interaction, URL.
Example:
“Explain how wind turbines generate electricity.” ChatGPT, Mar. 14 version, OpenAI, 21 July 2025, https://chat.openai.com/.
In-Text Citation: (ChatGPT)
Additional Resources:
NOTE: Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed.) doesn’t yet offer official rules for AI-generated content, follow the format recommended for software or personal communication, depending on how you used the tool.
Bibliography (optional if citing only in notes):
OpenAI. ChatGPT. Accessed July 21, 2025. https://chat.openai.com/.
Since AI doesn't fit cleanly into traditional authorship models, treat it like personal communication or unpublished material:
Footnote Example:
Bibliography (optional):
Chicago style generally does not require a bibliography entry for personal communications like interviews or AI prompts unless critical to your research.
Additional Resource:
In-Text Citation: (OpenAI, 2023)
Reference List Entry:
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/
Tip:
APA recommends describing the interaction in the text and including a reference list entry.
Example in your paper:
I used ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2023) to help brainstorm research topics. The model suggested areas such as sustainable architecture and urban climate design, which informed my early draft outline.
Additional Resource: