Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Impact Factor and Other Ways of Assessing the Research Value of a Journal: Home

Various ways to assess the research value of a journal.

Measures of research impact


An Impact Factor is one measure of the relative importance of a journal or scientist to science and social science literature and research.

Each index or uses a different methodology and produces slightly different results, revealing the importance of using several sources to judge the true impact of a journal's or scientist’s work. 

Careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:

  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications such as textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. For this reason, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.

Which measure do you use?

   Journal citation   



Measure of journal(s) impact X X
Includes theses & popular magazines X
Considers quality of citing journal X

Adjusts for disciplinary patterns, permitting cross-discipline comparisons 

Measure of author impact X
Uses 2 years of data X
Uses 5 years of data X
Uses all published years/articles X

Get Help 24/7

JavaScript disabled or chat unavailable.