SCU Library instruction program (2024-2025) by the numbers:
Considering instruction in all formats (including online tutorials), 53.3% of library instruction was with CTW courses, followed by electives (16.1%), required courses for majors (9.0%), and Advanced Writing (8.5%).
Besides ENGL, the top ten departments with library instruction were:
|
AY21/22 |
AY22/23 |
AY23/24 |
AY24/25 |
Instruction sessions (all formats)* |
268 |
336 |
257 |
412 |
Instruction sessions (synchronous) |
235 |
274 |
227 |
297 |
Total participants (all formats)** |
3251 |
3808 |
3243 |
4907 |
Total time (delivery+prep/follow-up time) (hours) |
1560 |
1426 |
945 |
762 |
* Includes online tutorials assigned to an entire class.
** Best estimate of participants, in all formats, including online tutorials. Students who have more than one library session in a course in a quarter are only counted once. However, this number is not unduplicated across courses (e.g., a student who has a library session in multiple courses is counted multiple times) or across quarters (e.g., a student who has multiple library sessions in a year). The SCU Library does not collect individual student data that would allow an accurate count of unique instruction participants.
As of the 2024-2025 academic year, SCU Library's instruction program participates in ACRL's Project Outcome as part of program assessment.
At the end of each synchronous instruction session, students are asked to complete a short survey. This instrument is a research-backed tool with standardized questions, allowing us to benchmark our instruction program performance against other institutions and collect information we can use locally for improvement.
In AY24-25, our survey had a 28.8% response rate.
Respondents were also asked what they liked most about their library session. Students most appreciated opportunities for active learning, being made aware of the variety and specialization of the databases and research resources the library makes available to them, and learning strategies for navigating those resources most effectively. Many commented on how helpful and relevant our instruction sessions were overall, and highlighted the support, enthusiasm, and patience provided by librarian instructors.
Interested in collaborating with the library instruction program on information literacy-related assessment in your course, program, department, or college?
Contact the Head of Instruction and Assessment, Rachel Wishkoski.